Verification-to-disable pipeline: the first documented case in the dataset where identity verification requested by Meta during an appeal was followed by permanent disable rather than account restoration. Sequence: (1) suspension with no policy cited — null citation at intake; (2) Instagram notice requests 'some info to help us review your account again' — video selfie verification; (3) reporter submits verification; (4) account permanently disabled with 'Community Standards on account integrity' citation. The reporter's characterization is direct: 'First you suspend accounts out of nowhere with zero explanation. Then you force people through humiliating selfie video verification like they're criminals, only to permanently disable the account anyway.' The policy-change-between-stages pattern (documented in PA-2026-0004) applies here: no policy at suspension, 'Community Standards on account integrity' at disable — both notices issued within approximately one day. The verification mechanism appears to have triggered a review that was used to finalize the disable rather than to verify identity for restoration. This raises a distinct concern: if the video selfie provides biometric data that enables reidentification across accounts, it could also be used to enforce against backup accounts or linked identities. 'Community Standards on account integrity' is the same policy category as PA-2026-0003 (bis___hop). Account profile: 155,400 Instagram posts — extremely active account. 30,000 X followers, verified. X post engagement on first post: 43,000 views — highest in dataset. Instagram account name shown in disable notice as 'rovvmut.ai' (not rovvmut_). Display name 'Heisenberg' used on both platforms. Follow-up comment context: reporter stated in comments that their Facebook account was also disabled — an additional cascade product not captured in the original screenshots. The Instagram suspension notice did not cite a Facebook account as the cause (unlike PA-2026-0003, PA-2026-0005, PA-2026-0008, PA-2026-0013), so the cascade direction cannot be confirmed from available evidence; it may be Instagram-primary propagating to Facebook, or both disabled independently. Reporter also stated the account had been growing through six months of intensive activity ('grinding'). Rapid organic growth over a short period is a known trigger for account integrity classifiers — the system may have flagged the growth pattern as potentially inauthentic behavior regardless of its actual origin. This behavioral growth signal is the most plausible account integrity trigger in the absence of any cited content violation.