platform_acknowledged: false). See methodology.
@akashsi67127604 publicly reports that Meta permanently disabled their Instagram account (@kash_singh_rajput) on May 24, 2026, reportedly for violating Community Standards on account integrity. The enforcement notice states 'You cannot request another review of this decision.' The reporter describes the account as approximately 8–10 years old, states they submitted an appeal that received no response, and the 'still doesn't follow' phrasing in the notice confirms a prior review cycle occurred before terminal closure.
Sources
Research patterns
All findings →Experienced something similar? See Resources for escalation paths by jurisdiction—EU/DSA, India, Turkey, and more. For US-based cases, Signal Flare covers the full stack: state Attorneys General, the FTC, and congressional offices.
This record is published under GDPR Art 89 public interest exemption. Data policy
Are you the subject of this record? Request erasure
Four analytically notable features. (1) Terminal disable — 'You cannot request another review of this decision' — extends the terminal-close cluster documented in PA-2026-0014 (@rovvmut_), PA-2026-0024 (@kornbuilds), PA-2026-0036 (@soycarmencuevas), PA-2026-0040 (@Shawinrose), and PA-2026-0041 (@discovenus_). PA-2026-0043 is the sixth terminal disable record in the dataset. (2) 'Still doesn't follow' language — second occurrence in the dataset; first was PA-2026-0041 ('still doesn't follow our Community Standards on fraud and deception'). Here the phrase appears with the account integrity policy rather than the fraud and deception policy, confirming that 'still doesn't follow' is a template phrase applied when prior review has occurred — not specific to any particular policy domain. Unlike PA-2026-0041, the reporter does not describe prior successful appeals; the 'still' phrasing confirms a prior enforcement or review cycle but not a prior successful adjudication. This case does not qualify for [[finding___re-enforcement-after-successful-adjudication]] absent evidence of a prior restoration. (3) Account integrity catch-all citation — 'Community Standards on account integrity' is now the most frequently cited policy in the dataset, appearing in 11 records across distinct account types. PA-2026-0043 is the first terminal disable in the dataset to cite this policy specifically; prior terminal disables cited either null policy (PA-2026-0014), bare 'Community Standards' (PA-2026-0040), or a named sub-policy ('fraud and deception' in PA-2026-0041). See [[finding___enforcement-notice-policy-opacity]]. (4) Appeal-submitted-under-terminal-notice — the reporter states 'I submitted an appeal but have received no update,' while the enforcement notice explicitly forecloses further review. This creates an unusual compound: the reporter engaged the appeal mechanism, but the enforcement notice provides no pathway for that appeal to produce an outcome. Whether the appeal was submitted before the terminal notice was served, or filed despite it, is unknown. The inaction mode (appeal submitted, no response) co-occurs with the terminal mode (no review mechanically possible) in a single case. See [[finding___appeal-access-failure-patterns]]. Geographic context: India-based reporter (Indian flag in display name), consistent with a notable India/South Asia concentration in the dataset (PA-2026-0021, -0023, -0025, -0027, -0035, -0039). Account tenure: 8–10 years, per reporter's statement — among the longest reported tenures for a terminally disabled account in the dataset, highlighting the asymmetry between accumulated account history and the irreversibility of terminal enforcement.